Bureaucrats, dave_user, Administrators
8,146
edits
Changes
→Test results
! SciMark 2.0 (Composite Score)
! CaffeineMark 3.0 (Overall score)
|-
| Oracle JDK 8
| 69.37
| 22673
|-
| OpenJDK 8(*)| ''3.62''| 605| The ''interpreted605'' JVM version explains the very poor performance
|-
| AdoptOpenJDK 8(*)| ''3.44''| 569| The ''interpreted569'' JVM version explains the very poor performance
|-
| ZuluCommunity 8
| 69.14
| 17237
|-
| AdoptOpenJDK 11
| '''82.39'''
| '''78111'''
|-
| LibericaJDK 11
| '''82.55'''
| '''77083'''
|-
| ZuluCommunity 11
| 69.61
| 17060
|-
|}
(*) The ''interpreted'' [[XELK-AN-009:_Comparing_JVMs_(Java_Virtual_Machines)_on_i.MX6_family_processors#ZeroVM | ZeroVM]] JVM version explains the very poor performance
==== XUELK ====
! SciMark 2.0 (Composite Score)
! CaffeineMark 3.0 (Overall score)
|-
| Oracle JDK 8
| 28.75
| 9426
|-
| OpenJDK 8(*)| ''1.68''| 257| The ''interpreted257'' JVM version explains the very poor performance
|-
| AdoptOpenJDK 8(*)| ''1.55''| 243| The ''interpreted243'' JVM version explains the very poor performance
|-
| ZuluCommunity 8
| 29.26
| 9482
|-
| AdoptOpenJDK 11
| '''54.23'''
| '''30268'''
|-
| LibericaJDK 11
| '''54.46'''
| '''27261'''
|-
| ZuluCommunity 11
| 29.16
| 9200
|-
|}
(*) The ''interpreted'' [[XELK-AN-009:_Comparing_JVMs_(Java_Virtual_Machines)_on_i.MX6_family_processors#ZeroVM | ZeroVM]] JVM version explains the very poor performance
For a detailed test command usage, please click on the ''Expand'' link:
